stonebender (
stonebender) wrote2003-06-21 08:03 pm
(no subject)
I get the feeling I have caused some of my friends some distress with my 20 mystery comments. Thinking back on the whole thing I probably should not have participated. I did enter into this particular meme with little thought. I use most of these live journal games and quizzes as a way to spur me toward posting. I have a bit of a love hate relationship with writing. I love having written something. I feel very accomplished when I complete a written work, but I don't like writing very much. I find it difficult to get started. I am often filled with self-doubt about what I write. Why the heck anyone would be interested in anything I had to say is often beyond me. What I have liked about live journal is because I want to feel included in this cool group of people, it pushes me to write.
Often when I do write, I talk myself out of posting what I have written one way or another. To circumvent this I have made myself a promise not to think too much about posting a piece of writing. Write it. Post it. Don't allow myself to talk myself out of posting my writing. This has worked well, helping me produce written material. I'm not sure it's worked very well for those who might be affected by what I have to say.
I did intend my 20 comments to be mostly positive (I don't think there's more than two or three that could be read as negative). I also never intended any comment (except in one circumstance) to really be about an individual friend. What I hoped would happen would be most of the comments could be applied to most of my friends one way or another. Sort of like my version of a positive Dot Cattiness. I never expected the few negative comments to be the ones that many believed were about them. I'm sorry if I caused anyone any distress.
It is important to realize that in several cases what my friends post in their journal is all I have to judge them by. Which is a very narrow data set to be making any judgments on at all. If anyone happens to think a particularly negative comment was for them. It most likely wasn't and if it was, what the heck do I know anyway?
no subject
Thanks for this. I decided not to get into that meme because of the very problem you experienced. I have a tendency to take too many things personally already. So in some ways, your list was a good QTIP ("Quit Taking It Personally") exercise for me ;^). My experience shows that most people are extremely good at listening for the negative, and discarding the positive, even when they're SURE that it's about them. I'm not surprised that many on your friends' list latched on to the negatives, and that few believed that the positives could REALLY be about them. It's a sad statement about our society that this is so for so many of us. Nevertheless, it's comforting to have you write this, and I appreciate that you took the time to do so. Says some good things about how much you value your friends (and even acquaintances).
Thanks.
no subject
the apology is nice, but my first thought is that you may be worrying too much. and now i'm reluctant to tell you that because it might be interpreted as discouraging this piece of writing and that's not how it's intended--it's meant to be reassuring about the earlier piece of writing. eep!
no subject
My comment wasn't a response to any comment I received here.
the apology is nice, but my first thought is that you may be worrying too much.
Who, Me!? :-) It wouldn't be the first time.
and now i'm reluctant to tell you that because it might be interpreted as discouraging this piece of writing and that's not how it's intended--it's meant to be reassuring about the earlier piece of writing. eep!
*chuckle* I'm reassured. Thank you Lisa. I'm not as easily discouraged as I may present myself.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
FWIW
I like it that you write stuff. So whatever gets you writing is all right by me. :)
Re: FWIW
no subject
no subject
no subject
*smooch*
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject