stonebender: (Default)
[personal profile] stonebender
I'm reposting the sexual compatability meme because my sweetie's listed now. I'm a little bummed I don't have anyone scoring higher than 60%.

My new
lysana 60%
hopeforyou 60%
serenejournal 59%
klwalton 59%
kightp 57%
jeni 56%
kshandra 55%
wispfox 55%
rivka 54%
computerchix 53%
elynne 52%
teal7 51%
starstraf 48%
dawnd 42%
lilairen 38%
nolly 33%
the_ogre 30%
the_siobhan 28%
joedecker 27%
lissa_dora 27%
bottomsexxx 24%
epi_lj 23%
wcg 0%
How sexually compatible with me are you?
Take the NEW sexual compatibility quiz at LJMatch!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 04:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
[livejournal.com profile] deyo never showed up on my list.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 05:12 pm (UTC)
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
From: [personal profile] firecat
My highest match was 61%, and I haven't seen a lot of results above that in other folks' lists either.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kightp.livejournal.com
I have a surprising number in the mid-60s and above, but I suspect that's because I gave more-or-less positive answers to almost everything but the scat questions, and had a *lot* of however-they-worded that mid-range "maybe, maybe not" responses.

I didn't like the answer choices. I'd have preferred a range that went from "Yes, please, more" to "No way in hell," with "it depends on the circumstances" or "try me on a good night" in the middle.

But that's just me. (-:

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 07:37 pm (UTC)
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
From: [personal profile] firecat
I didn't like the answer choices either. I wasn't sure how to convey the "well, I used to, back before HIV and when I was still doing drugs, but it's not really possible now" responses.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 10:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stonebender.livejournal.com
Scat questions? I don't remember any scat questions. Maybe I didn't answer some questions.

I didn't like the answers either. I wouldn't have minded a couple, "with the right person" responses.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 11:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kightp.livejournal.com
You may be right - I know there was something in there that hit my squick button, but it may have been something else.

Ditto on the "right person, right circumstances." Yes/No just doesn't work for me for so much of this ...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-20 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wispfox.livejournal.com
Yeah - that's about how I answered. And about the kinds of additional answers I would have liked. Although I also wanted a 'haven't tried it but wouldn't be against it', rather than just 'haven't tried it but curious'.

Silly quiz!

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 10:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stonebender.livejournal.com
I thought I saw a bunch of 70 somethings on a few of the results. I'm pretty sure [personal profile] rivka had some high numbers. I'm probably just having a bad self-image day. How new and unusual. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 10:23 pm (UTC)
firecat: red panda, winking (Default)
From: [personal profile] firecat
I have no idea what those feel like. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 11:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stonebender.livejournal.com
I can't imagine how you would.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-18 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com
My highest so far is 41%.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-20 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com
I'm way more than 59% hot for you, so obviously this test has problems. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-21 05:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stonebender.livejournal.com
Absolutely! *holding you*

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-21 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com
Mmmmmm. Miss the fuck out of you, sweetness. *kisskisskisskisskiss*

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-22 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deyo.livejournal.com
I'm reposting the sexual compatability meme because my sweetie's listed now. I'm a little bummed I don't have anyone scoring higher than 60%.

This is why the original "compatibility" test went from 20% to 120% -- inflated numbers make people feel good, and reflect the obvious fact that people on your friends list should have some assumed innate compatibility. They received numerous complaints from people disturbed by the concept of "106% compatibility"

For this test, they went with more mathematically sound calculations, and came up with numbers we think of as "less representative" of our own compatibility.

LJMatch just can't win for losing. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-22 10:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stonebender.livejournal.com
I remember some people getting over 100 percent numbers. I thought it was odd, but it wouldn't have occurred to me to complain about it. In this venue, I don't particularly mind inflated numbers. Thanks for the background though.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-10-23 05:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com
Hey, baby, c'mere and I'll inflate your numbers. *smooooooch*

Profile

stonebender: (Default)
stonebender

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
2021222324 2526
2728293031  

Important (to me) Links

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags